How can you improve E-A-1T for web sites and entities

In recent years, the concept of authority, trustworthiness and expertise (E-A–T) played an important role in ranking websites and keywords.

Hyung-Jin Kim (VP Search, Google) announced at SMX Next that Google uses E-A-T principles to rank for over ten years.

What makes E-A-T so significant?

Kim stated in his :

E-A-T stands for Evaluation of a Site. It is applied to all queries and results. This is a fundamental part of everything we do.”

This statement shows that E-A-T matters not only for , but also for keywords and all other topics. E-A-T seems to have a wide impact on Google’s algorithm for ranking pages.

Google has faced a lot of pressure over misinformation in search engine results for many years. The whitepaper “How Google combats disinformation” was presented at the Munich Security Conference in February 2019.

Google is working to improve its search engine to deliver great content to the relevant search queries based on user context. This is where the quality raters are a key role.

We need to hear from our users every day about how our ranking systems are performing and what improvements they would like. This is a key component of our evaluation process. What does it mean to “work well?” Our publicly accessible rater guidelines provide detailed information about how our systems are designed to produce great content.

Quality raters must evaluate their work according to EA-T criteria.

They assess whether the pages provide the required information based upon their knowledge of the query. Then they evaluate how trustworthy and authoritative the source appears to be regarding the subject. To evaluate things like expertise, authoritativeness, and trustworthiness–sometimes referred to as “E-A-T”–raters are asked to do reputational research on the sources.”

It is important to distinguish between document relevance and source quality. Google’s ranking magic takes place in these two areas.

It becomes evident when you look at statements by different Google spokespersons regarding a quality score at both the domain and document level.

Paul Haahr, a SMX West 2016 presenter titled Story, shared these:

“Another issue we had was a problem with quality, and this was especially bad. It was between 2008 and 2009. There were many complaints regarding low quality content, and we were correct.

We kept seeing similar low-quality content, but our relevancy metrics were still increasing. This is because low-quality pages could be extremely relevant.

We thought this was the best way to define a content type in our worldview.

We were reporting great numbers, but we delivered a horrible user experience. It turned out that we didn’t measure what was needed. We ended up defining a quality metric that directly addressed the problem of quality. Relevance is not the same thing.

It allowed us to create quality-related signals apart from the relevant signals , and actually improve these independently . If the metrics are missing something, ranking engineers should fix them or create new metrics.

This quote comes from the portion of the talk about the guidelines for quality raters and E-A–T.

Haahr mentioned also that:

• E-A-T is only possible if you are trustworthy.
• These criteria are the guidelines that the quality raters have established for websites and content, and they serve as the basis for the way the system should operate.

John Mueller said the following during a Google Webmaster Hangout in 2016:

We try to find the right pages and their context to be able to properly show them in our search. However, there are certain things that we will look at the website in its entirety.

Understanding the type of website that this page is allows us to understand why we need to start searching for it.

This is a situation where you can have both. The pages, as well as the entire site, are important.

There is a common misconception that Google has one number for all sites. This is not true. We consider many factors, and we don’t just look at one quality score for all sites.

We try to see a range of signals that are combined, some per page and some per site. But it is not the case of one number coming from all five pages of your website.

Mueller highlights that, in addition to traditional relevance ratings, there is also a rating system that relates to the overall website’s thematic context.

Google uses these signals to categorize and assess the website. It is easy to see the proximity of E-A-T ratings.

The Google whitepaper previously mentioned contains several passages about E-A-T as well as the guidelines for quality raters.

We continue to make Search better every day. Google ran more than 200k experiments in 2017 that led to approximately 2,400 Search changes. Every one of these changes has been tested to ensure it conforms to our publicly accessible Search Quality Rater Guidelines. These guidelines define our goals for our ranking systems and guide external evaluators that provide continuous assessments of our algorithms.

The systems don’t make subjective decisions about truthfulness, but instead focus on quantifiable signals that indicate how other sites and users value the authority, trustworthiness or authoritativeness of the webpage on topics covered.

Ranking algorithms play an essential role in the fight against misinformation. Ranking raises relevant information. Our algorithms identify the most trustworthy and authoritative information above other information. The assessments are specific to each website’s search and may differ for different webpages. A national news agency’s articles may be considered authoritative for current events searches, but not as reliable for gardening searches.

Our ranking system doesn’t identify whether a piece of content is intended or accurate in its facts. It is designed to help identify websites with high knowledge and authority .

We assume users will expect us to adhere to the highest standards of safety and trustworthiness for these YMYLpages. Our algorithms will recognize that the query is related to “YMYL”, and we’ll give greater weight in our ranking systems to consider factors such as authority, expertise or trustworthiness.

This statement is especially interesting because it demonstrates how effective E-A-T can in certain situations and regarding events, compared with traditional relevance factors.

We have created our systems so that authority is more important than factors such as recency and exact word matches, even if a crisis is developing.

You can see the effects of EA-T in several from recent years.

E-A_T has an impact on rankings, but it’s and not.

In recent years, there has been a lot of discussion about whether E-A–T can influence rankings, and if so how. Nearly all SEOs believe it to be a concept, or a type of layer that enhances the relevancy scoring.

Google has confirmed that E-A_T is and not a ranking factor. does not have an E-A-T score.

E-A-T is a collection of signals and criteria that serves as an example for Google’s algorithm to determine whether a person has the expertise, authority, and trust necessary (i.e. quality).

Google speaks however of an algorithmic rating that is applied to each search query. This means that there should be data or signals available to be used for an assessment.

Google utilizes the manual ratings from search evaluators to train its self-learning algorithm (keyword:supervised machine learning), which identifies patterns in high-quality sources and content.

Google is now closer to meeting the E-A–T criteria as per the guidelines for quality raters.

Google may also consider these signals and criteria if the quality of the sources and content rated high or low by search engine evaluators is repeated.

E-A-T, in my view, is composed of many origins.

• Entity-based rating.
• (exPanda). Based rating.
• Link-based rating.

Google uses an entity-based index like the Knowledge Graph and Knowledge Vault to rate sites such as authors, domains, or publishers. You can bring entities into thematic contexts and record their connection.

Google has tried-and-true algorithms such as Panda and Coati that can be used to assess the quality of content on individual domains.

Google has confirmed PageRank as the sole signal that E-A-T is valid. Google uses links to evaluate trust and authority since over twenty years.

This infographic is based on official statements and patents from Google.

These signals must be distinguished by SEOs in order to influence E-A–T positively.

On-page

You can get signals from your website. It is both the whole content and its details.

Off-page

External signals. These signals can come from external sources, such as audio, video, or search queries, that Google can crawl.

Particularly important are links and co-occurrences between the name of company, publisher, author, or domain, in relation to thematically related terms.

These co-occurrences are more common than others, which means that main entities will likely have some connection to the keyword cluster and topic.

Google must crawl these co-occurrences. Google will only recognize you and include you in its E-A-T program. Google also considers co-occurrences of search terms as a source.

Sentiment

Google employs natural language processing (NLP) to analyse the mood of people, products, and companies.

You can leave reviews from Google, Yelp and other sites.

Google patents address this issue, including ” .”

SEOse is able to draw concrete steps for positively impacting E-A-T signals from these results.

There are 15 things you can do to increase your E-A-T

Google’s E-A-T is a final attempt to adjust “thematic branding positioning”, which marketers used over centuries to create brands.

A person will trust a service provider or product more often than they see them in certain contexts.

Additionally, the authority of an entity that is:

• More often mentioned in thematic contexts that other market participants.
• Other credible, authoritative sources are positively cited.

These repetitions help to retrain the brain’s neural network. As a brand, we are perceived with trustworthiness and thematic authority.

Google’s neural network learns from this who is trustworthy and an authority for one or several topics. This is especially true for co-occurrences during the awareness, consideration, and preference phases.

Google will associate your keyword cluster with the more topics you are involved in. This link will be drawn if you are a member of the relevant group with your content.

You can create these co-occurrences, for instance, by:

• Content on the page should be appropriate.
• Internal linking should be done in a responsible manner.
• Use appropriate off-page material.
• Search patterns are influenced by external/incoming links and anchor text.

There are many creative options, particularly with regards to off-page signals. There are no common SEO strategies that can cause this co-occurrence.

SEO professionals are becoming more and more the link between marketing, technology, and PR .

Here is an overview of some concrete steps that can be taken to maximize E-A-T.

1. Your website should contain enough topic-relevant material

Google will see semantic topics in your site as evidence of your deep knowledge and expertise.

2. Link semantically-appropriate content with the main content

Each content must be connected to each other when building semantic topic universes.

It is also important to consider the user journey. Which are the next interests of the customer?

If they are useful, outgoing links can be helpful if the user or Google sees that you refer to authoritative sources.

3. Work with respected experts such as reviewers, authors, co-authors, and influencers.

Google has already acknowledged them as expert online through “Recognized”.

• Online publications
• Amazon author profiles.
• They have their own websites and blogs.
• Profiles on social media
• Profils available on universities’ websites.
• More.

Google can crawl references from authors in any thematic context. This is especially important for YMYL subjects.

It is preferable to have authors who are familiar with the subject and have published long-term web-findable material on it.

4. Increase your content share on a particular topic

A company’s share of relevant document corpus is proportional to how much content it publishes.

This will increase the subject’s authority. It doesn’t really matter if this content is posted on your site or elsewhere. It is important that these content can be tracked by Google.

Guest articles on other authoritative media can help increase the content you have to offer. They should be more authority than they already are.

You can also increase the content of your website by:

• Create thematically relevant guest posts, and link them with your website and social media accounts.
• Arrange interviews about relevant subjects.
• Lectures at special events
• As a speaker, you can participate in webinars.

5. Write text in simple terms

Google employs natural language processing (NLP) to comprehend content and extract data from entities.

Google is more comfortable capturing simple sentences than complicated ones. Google is more comfortable capturing simple sentences than complex ones.

6. For content creation, use TF-IDF analysis

To identify sub-entities semantically similar to a topic, tools for TFIDF analysis are available. This is a sign of expertise.

7. Do not write superficial or thin content

Google might devalue your site if it has a lot or too little content. Instead, delete or consolidate any thin or superficial content.

8. The knowledge gap is being filled

The majority of the content that you find online comes from a curation of information or a copy of existing content. This content is often referenced in thousands or hundreds of other articles.

The best way to gain true expertise in a subject is by adding different perspectives and aspects.

9. Respect consensus

Google defines knowledge-based trust in a scientific paper as the way content sources are evaluated on the basis of consensus information and popular opinion.

It can prove crucial to place your content in the top search results, particularly for YMYL (i.e. medical) topics.

10. Make factual content and link to authority sources.

All information and statements must be supported by facts, and should include links to reliable sources.

This is particularly important when it comes to YMYL subjects.

11. Transparency about publishers, authors and other content.

Although author boxes do not rank for Google directly, they are a great way to learn more about an unknown author.

Advantages include an imprint page and an “About us” page. Include links to:

• Commitments.
• Content.
• Profils of authors and speakers.
• Profiles on social media

As link text to your representations, entity names can be very useful. It is recommended to use structured data such as schema markup.

12. Be careful not to use too many recommendation ads and advertising banners

Trust scores can be lower when there is aggressive advertising, such as Outbrain and Taboola ads.

13. Marketing and communication can create co-competition besides your website.

It is important to establish yourself thematically as an E-A-T brand by:

• Your website should link to specialist publications on subject matter so Google can easily assign them.
• Linking to thematically related environments
• Online advertising can influence Google search trends or generate suitable search terms (TV advertisements, flyers and ads). This isn’t image advertising, but advertising that helps to position a topic.
• Cooperating with partners or suppliers to achieve the best co-occurrences
• Create PR campaigns to coincide with the appropriate co-occurrences No pure image PR.
• You can create buzz on social media about your company.

14. Optimize your website for user signals

Analyze the search intent for every main keyword. Search intent should be matched with the content’s purpose.

15. Great reviews are easy to get

Publicly, people are more likely to share negative experiences with companies.

E-A-T can find this a problem as negative feelings can spread around the business. Encourage satisfied customers to tell others about their good experiences.

These opinions are not necessarily those of Search Engine Land, but they do reflect the views of the guest author. Here are the names of staff authors.

• Author
• Recent Posts

Luke Smith

Luke Smith is a paid media consultant specializing in performance marketing such as SEM, paid social, video, and display. He has worked at a media agency in Sydney, Australia for over three years, running Facebook, AdWords, YouTube, Snapchat, and Twitter activity for large multi-national companies. With his expertise in lead generation, he has helped online coaches and entrepreneurs build their business online using targeted Facebook Ad strategies alongside a solid marketing funnel and provided services to large corporations including Estée Lauder, Clinique, McDonald's, Bobbi Brown, and Bacardi.

Latest posts by Luke Smith (see all)

• Google testing verification badges - March 27, 2023
• Google Search Console breaks out Merchant listings and Product snippets appearances - March 27, 2023
• How to write title tags for SEO with ChatGPT - March 27, 2023